Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Summer Reading Lists: Let's Sign a Blood Oath

I loved this post on Paper Cuts about making a list of "Summer Reading Goals," a roll-call of books to be read over the summer, just like back in elementary school (or the summer before AP English). I thought I'd post mine here so that everyone could check back in and mock me if I didn't finish all of them. Shame is a powerful motivating factor for me.

Here are the books I will read this summer:

The Known World, by Edward P. Jones. I know, I should've read this by now. You know why I haven't? It's a dumb reason, but I'll tell you. My wife got a hardcover copy of this back when it came out, and I really prefer to read paperbacks. Who wants to lug around a hardcover all the time? And I just can't bring myself to buy a second copy of the book, which means that eventually, I'll have to sit down with the hardcover. It's going to happen this summer.

Murder in Amsterdam, by Ian Buruma. I somehow missed this book entirely when it came out a few years back, but I recently read an essay of Buruma's about Mel Gibson's anti-semitic tirade, and it piqued my interest. This examination of Holland's reaction to the murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh seems like the better bet than Martin Amis' largely panned The Second Plane (although part of me wants to hear Amis tear into someone, anyone. That's always fun).

The Girl in the Flammable Skirt, by Aimee Bender. I'm remedying one of my short story blind spots. Everybody tells me these stories are weird, fun, heartbreaking...all the good short story adjectives. Bender sounds like good summer reading to me.

In the Drink, by Kate Christensen. My literary crush on Kate Christensen is well-documented. It continues this summer as I track down her first novel.

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, by John Le Carre. I liked The Spy Who Came in from the Cold, which I read a few years ago in Paris. It's time I got around to another Le Carre novel.

Please Excuse My Daughter, by Julie Klam. We all know how much I like Julie Klam's blog. Yesterday, I was killing time down on the sales floor, and I picked this up and read the first two pages and laughed twice. I don't read many memoirs, but I think I'll make an exception for this one.

Decline and Fall, by Evelyn Waugh. My token "dead British guy" for the summer.

Could I finish all these this summer? I think so. Will I? I hope so. What are your reading goals for the summer? Post them in the comments. We'll motivate each other to push on!

Labels: , ,

Monday, May 26, 2008

A Short Story Recommendation

Continuing with our celebration of National Short Story Month, I wanted to point people in the direction of one of the best short stories I've read in years. Actually, I read it a few years ago, back when I was working at a different independent bookstore. I had the 4pm to Midnight Friday and Saturday newsstand shift (or as I liked to call it, the Lonely Weirdo with No Social Life shift), and we weren't supposed to read at the newsstand (it made it too easy for people to steal porn). But one night, I did read at the newsstand, and what I read was "The Affairs of Each Beast" by David Benioff. It was unlike most of the other short fiction I had read in that it was set in Chechnya and featured Russian infantrymen as protagonists. Much porn was stolen that night, my friends. It's available online at the Zoetrope All-Story site. Enjoy.

David Benioff will be at Vroman's to read from and sign his excellent new book City of Thieves (click on the link to read my recommendation of the book!) on Wednesday, June 4 at 7 pm. See you there.

Labels: , ,

Friday, May 23, 2008

Friday is For Links

As the weekend looms, some links to send you on your way:
  • The 1001 books to read before you die. I can just see myself getting really far into the list, like one book away, then finding myself on a doomed airplane. Plummeting to earth, my death just moments away, I stand up: "Shit! Does anybody on-board have a copy of Moll Flanders?" Making lists like this is stupid.
  • The Morning News has a list of stuff they like on the Internet this year. They call it the 2008 Eddys. I was all jazzed to check out Colorwars, which they dub "what the web’s next wave will look like: Twitter-fied mob jollies, or, Improv Everywhere applied to Web 2.0." But then the link was broken.
  • This is what happens when Mark Sarvas goes on book tour and misses a few days of blogging.
  • Apropos of nothing at all, how badass is Kingsley Amis' Wikipedia photo:

Labels: , , , , ,

The Ten Best Living Short Story Writers

May is National Short Story Month. I didn't know this until recently. Why doesn't National Short Story Month get the same attention as National Poetry Month? I suspect it's due to the powerful poetry lobby in Washington. Just you wait until John McCain gets rid of their insidious influence, then the short stories will finally get their due!

In honor of the National Short Story Month, I thought I'd compile a list of the Ten Best Living Short Story Writers (according to me):

1. Lorrie Moore
2. Stuart Dybek
3. George Saunders
4. Denis Johnson
5. Amy Hempel
6. John Updike
7. Dan Chaon
8. Mary Gaitskill
9. Thom Jones
10. JD Salinger

Writers I haven't read enough of but who probably deserve to be on the list: Aimee Bender, Tobias Wolff, Ann Beattie, Edward P. Jones, David Foster Wallace. I happen to like AM Homes' novels better than her stories. I've never cared for Alice Munro, but I'm willing to give her another try. I think I'll never be able to like William Trevor as much as the editors at The New Yorker do.

Waiting for more evidence: Ander Monson. Sam Lipsyte. Edan Lepucki.

Honorable mention in a special category: Adrian Tomine.

Who would you have on your list? Post it in the comments.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, May 22, 2008

A Review Kate Christensen's The Great Man

Kate Christensen’s newest novel The Great Man, for which she recently won the 2008 PEN/Faulkner Award for fiction, is actually about three women and their relationship to one not-so-great man, the figurative painter Oscar Feldman. Claire St. Cloud, or “Teddy” as she’s known to her confidants, was Oscar’s lover, Abigail Feldman, his widow and the mother of his autistic son, and Maxine Feldman, his sister, an abstract painter and a masculine lesbian. While he was alive, these three women orbited Oscar each in their own path, glimpsing one another at openings and parties, but never approaching, knowing of each other’s existence but not acknowledging it.

After Oscar’s death, a pair of biographers come calling in search of the life of the great Oscar Feldman. These two biographers -- Henry Burke, a tentative 40 year-old white man heading into a difficult stretch in his marriage, and Ralph Washington, a gay black man struggling with his own analysis and critique of Oscar’s work – dredge up feelings long buried and force hard confrontations between the three female protagonists.

Christensen’s previous novel, The Epicure’s Lament, was a tour de force of voice, a blistering first-person screed that showed her flair for language, pacing and character. Here, the voice is reserved, but the point of view is constantly shifting. Indeed, the genius of this novel is in how, through its floating perspective, it coaxes the reader into making certain assumptions about the characters, and then subverts those assumptions. In this way, it mirrors the experience of a work of art in the critical marketplace. Much of the book is concerned with the legacies of the two artists – Oscar and Maxine – and how their work has been and will be perceived by critics. While some of the theoretical discussions of art seem facile, Christensen makes a sly comment on the “eye of the beholder.” Implicit in these discussions, of course, is the notion of taste and its inherent place within perspective.

The novel opens on Teddy, a particularly crafty bit of manipulation on Christensen’s part, as it places the reader firmly in Teddy’s camp, never giving him a second to see Teddy as the “other woman.” We get Teddy’s view of Abigail, “Oscar’s fat wife,” and feel her sacrifices (when she went into labor with Oscar’s twin daughters, Ruby and Samantha, it was her friend Lila she called, since she couldn’t call Oscar. In fact, she learned of his death when she read the obituary in the New York Times).

Just as we settle perfectly beside elegant, seductive Teddy, Christensen moves on to Maxine, Oscar’s cantankerous sister. Maxine can’t stand Teddy, who she feels is all flash and no substance and a home-wrecker. Maxine, easily the least happy of the characters, hungers for some sort of companionship, preferably that of younger assistant Katerina. Maxine feels “that her advanced age should have granted her some kind of immunity from the humiliation of unrequited lust. That it didn’t was yet another of the many indignities of old age.”

Surprisingly, the indignities of old age are few and far between in this story of three women, all of whom are north of 70. Not since Kingsley Amis’ The Old Devils has there been a novel that addresses aging so well. Where Amis was largely concerned with the collision between infirmity and desire, his old men chasing women like twenty-year-olds while gingerly biting into toast to avoid rotted teeth, Christensen are more feminine concerns. Companionship, or lack thereof, motherhood and its consolations, and plenty of domestic issues take precedence in The Great Man. That’s not to say there’s no lust – there’s plenty of it. Requited and unrequited love takes up much of the book. Sure there’s talk of exhaustion and failing erections, and yes, one of the characters discusses her will, but the reader is left with the sense that these women are vibrantly alive, still entangled in the messiness of love and sex, of family, of living.

For all the comparisons between Amis and Christensen (Is it a coincidence that the Christensen chose a poem from Amis’ good friend Philip Larkin as her epigraph?), there is a key difference between her work and Amis’. Kingsley Amis published The Old Devils in 1986, when he was 64 years old and just nine years from the grave (not that he could’ve known it). He was writing from experience. Christensen published The Great Man in 2007 at the age of 45. For Christensen to so thoroughly craft the twilight of these women’s lives is a remarkable feat of imagination. To project forward is a hundredfold harder than looking back, and Christensen masters it with this novel.

Among the pleasures of Christensen’s writing are the dining and cooking scenes. Many authors, most in fact, treat eating as something the characters occasionally must do, no different than crossing the street, or as a prop to fill the scene with action, or a topic of conversation, maybe. But nobody uses food quite as well as Christensen. The Epicure’s Lament was laden with detailed descriptions of meals prepared, including a fine recipe for Shrimp Newberg. For the narrator, Hugo Whittier, food is a benchmark of culture, like a play or a novel, and its proper execution a matter of pride and honor. The Great Man is no different. Many of the scenes revolve around a meal. When Henry first visits Teddy, she seduces him with a subtle, surprisingly tasty stew:
“The food, which looked bland and unprepossessing, was subtle and amazing. The couscous tasted nutty and buttery. The rich chicken stew was laced with hints of saffron, cinnamon, cayenne, lemon zest, and something else, unfamiliar and exotic, but these things announced themselves very faintly, so he had to concentrate to taste them through the perfectly cooked meat and grain.”
Each meal reveals something about its maker. Teddy’s dish, made from a chicken for which she bartered and vegetables from her backyard garden, displays not only her skills as a seductress, but also her independence, her resourcefulness. It’s a different story when Maxine attends a dinner party at her longtime dealer, Michael Rubinstein’s house:
“The soup bowls were whisked away and plates of summery salad replaced them: a Japanese woodcut sea of curly pale green frisee lettuce on which floated almond slice rafts, each holding a tiny, near-translucent poached baby shrimp as pink and naked as a newborn. Crisp blanched haricots verts darted through the sea like needle-nosed fish. Cerise-rimmed radish slices bobbed here and there like sea foam. The dressing was a briny green lime juice and olive oil emulsion. Maxine stared at the thing, trying to imagine the person who had so painstakingly made it. It would be demolished in three bites. She would have been perfectly happy with a wedge of iceberg lettuce with a glop of bottled Russian dressing, like you got in the olden days.
Food had become so fussy and contrived.”
Christensen’s obsession with food can, at times, overwhelm (I stopped noticing how often a scene revolved around a meal about halfway through the book), but it adds a verisimilitude that eludes lesser authors. Christensen’s characters eat, they sleep and work. They live.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Teaching Writing: An Interview with Edan Lepucki

Edan Lepucki is a fiction writer and writing instructor. She is a graduate of Oberlin College and the Iowa Writers' Workshop. Her fiction has appeared in StoryQuarterly, The LA Times West Magazine, Cutbank, and Meridian. She recently returned from a semester teaching creative writing at her alma mater, Oberlin College. Starting June 3, she will teach a class called Introduction to Fiction Writing for Vroman's Ed, as well as a private writing workshop for teenagers. Edan was good enough to sit down and answer some questions about teaching writing, writing workshops, and how she balances writing and teaching.

How long have you been teaching creative writing?

I’ve been teaching since the fall of 2004, when I began graduate school at the Iowa Writers’ Workshop. There, I taught a required general education course called The Interpretation of Literature, and then a class called Creative Writing Studio, which covered fiction, nonfiction and poetry in one breathless semester. Since Iowa, I’ve been teaching fiction writing privately and at Vroman’s Ed, and online with Gotham Writers’ Workshop. This spring I returned to academia to teach fiction writing at my alma mater, Oberlin College. That makes almost 4 years of teaching. Wow!

I know lots of people don’t believe talent can be taught. What’s your response to that? Is there really a way to teach someone to be a good fiction writer?

I don’t think talent can be taught, but I do believe it can be nurtured, and that a good teacher should shed light on your strengths and weaknesses as a writer. Many students come to me with terrific and daring voices, but without any idea how to write a scene, or how to get a character across the room, or how to use a semi-colon, or how to make two characters talk to each other in dynamic ways, and so on and so forth. It’s my mission, I think, to give them these tools. I can teach someone to write good fiction, for sure—whether it’s great? Well, that’s up to the student. A lot of what people call talent is really just hard work, perseverance, and passion—both for writing, and reading.

What sort of techniques do you like to focus on in an introductory course? How does an introductory course differ from a more advanced one?

In any introductory course, I cover the basics of fiction writing technique. I always begin with character, and from there move on to voice, point of view, scene/summary, and dialogue. Along the way, we also discuss prose style, plot/dramatic conflict, and endings. In my beginning classes, I assign writing exercises designed to tackle whatever craft technique we’re exploring that week, and the stories we read are also discussed from that angle. In my more advanced classes, there isn’t such a design—there are no weekly topics, for instance—and I run formal workshops, where students critique each other’s work. In the intro class, students are welcome to share their writing, but it’s not required.

All of my classes are challenging, a little raucous, and definitely fun. I try to create a relaxed environment, where people are comfortable enough to share their thoughts.


Who are some writing teachers who have had an influence on you, both on how you write and how you teach?

Dan Chaon, my professor at Oberlin (and recently my colleague!), was my mentor for a long time. He was always supportive of my work, but he gave in-depth criticism too, and I’ve strived to adopt that same balance in my teaching. More than any other teacher, Dan pushed me to explore material that some might call too dark, too sad, too messed up. I think whatever emotional resonance I attempt in my work has its origins in the lessons I got from him.

At Iowa, Chris Offutt was a tough teacher whose high standards made me work harder. I’ve certainly inherited his intolerance for certain verbs and weak language! I also loved working one-on-one with Samantha Chang, the new director of the program. She was masterful at discussing a story’s structure, and asking pretty tough questions that I usually didn’t know the answer to (but thought about for days afterward). She didn’t provide easy, technical solutions to stories, and I appreciated that. It made me think deeply about my work, as I hope my students begin to do after working with me.

How important is it for a writer to workshop her work, to have her peers critique it?

I think a writer should show their work to at least two readers; it’s wonderful to have that kind of support, and to be challenged by people who get your aesthetic. A workshop can be really helpful (and terrifying—but in a good way), but I don’t believe it needs to be a part of a writer’s life forever. The thing is, in a workshop you learn the most not from the feedback you get, but the feedback you give. Learning to critique other people’s writing is so illuminating, and it will make you treat your own writing more objectively.

Do you ever worry that teaching takes away from your own writing? Keith Gessen has recently written about the trap of academia, how it can be the only way for a writer to sustain himself, but also a convenient way to avoid actually writing?

Teaching is definitely time consuming, and it can be a terrific way to avoid writing (I think I’ve mastered the art of avoiding writing…). That said, I don’t think I could only write—I’m far too social (and, okay, I’m a total showboat). I find that I actually write more when I’m teaching, partly because the discourse invigorates me, and partly because, if I’m going to tell a bunch of people how to write, I better be doing it myself! Teaching forces me to have opinions—about stories, about craft—and these opinions give my creative life direction.

Thanks, Edan! If you would like to sign up for Edan's Introduction to Fiction Writing class at Vroman's, please call (626) 449-5320.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Tuesday Round Up

A few links to help ease you through Tuesday.
  • At n+1, Keith Gessen has a thoughtful piece about how to survive, financially, as a writer:
    Once the book is published it only gets worse: the writer proceeds to the Cavalry of publicity. Advances on first books vary—about $20,000 to $60,000 for a book of stories, though sometimes higher; between $50,000 and $250,000 for a "literary" novel, though also, sometimes, higher. Even the top figure—$250,000—which seems like so much, and is so much, still represents on both sides of the writing and rewriting, the pre-publication and post-publication, about four years of work—$60,000 a year, the same as a hack lifestyle journalist in New York. But the costs! The humiliations! No one will ever forgive a writer for getting so much money in one lump—not the press, not other writers, and his publisher least of all.
  • Julie Klam hearts my blog. You can't see me right now, but I'm blushing.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, May 19, 2008

Guns, with Occasional Reading: Dispatches from James Frey at the Whisky


Half way through James Frey's sound check (how many reading events have a sound check?), I was starting to get worried. What if nobody showed? What if, when Josh Kilmer-Purcell took the stage, the crowd was just us booksellers and the sizable security crew that Frey and the Whisky had on hand? The band had just finished their impossibly loud warm-up when Brian from Book Soup ducked outside. He returned with a positive report. "There's a shitload of people out there."

Indeed there were. Many of them were there to see the metal band Black Tide, but there were in fact, a ton of people at the event. Josh Kilmer-Purcell kicked things off by showing a video of a dramatic reading of a lost episode of Dynasty that he'd written in his youth. The actors were MySpace friends of his, each of them videotaping their portion of the scene from their home/office. After that, Kilmer-Purcell read from his new novel Candy Everybody Wants. The metal fans were a bit restless, but responded to the reading pretty well.

After his reading, the crowd excitement began to build. Kilmer-Purcell hung out in a booth near that back while folks waited patiently for him to sign his book. Then the house lights went down, the stage lights came on, and Black Tide took the stage. The kids up front by the stage went nuts as the band started to play. Black Tide's lead singer looks like he's about fourteen (I learned from Brian that he was actually fifteen), and their drummer works out a lot. A lot. Dude has serious abs. Their music sounded to me like Metalica, and later in the set, they played a Metalica cover. Black Tide played for about a half an hour. They opened their set by demanding that the Whisky move the tables set up near the stage, a demand that wasn't met (with dire consequences later in the evening). The kids danced like crazy, throwing fear into the hearts of some of the bookish crowd who'd come for Frey. It was fun to watch. From the back of the club. By the books.


At the end of the set, the stage lights went down, cloaking the club in darkness. Black Tide went into a thumping, churning rhythm, building the tension in anticipation of the main event. James Frey took the stage wearing a t-shirt, khakis, black rim glasses and an LA Dodgers hat (I wonder if he wore a Yankee hat at the event in New York?). He sat down on a stool and immediately launched into his reading. "Larry is a hater. A mean ass hater..." As he read, Black Tide played along, throwing in guitar riffs and drum fills to accent the words. Frey read in his droning monotone, at times swallowed whole by the booming bass and tom-tom of the Black Tide rhythm section. He read a part Bright Shiny Morning about Larry, a gun dealer who hates everybody, and a woman who buys a gun to get revenge on the man who raped her. The sinister chapter of the book was a perfect match for the menacing music and Terry Richardson's stark photos of skinheads and gang-bangers projected behind Frey and the band.

At the end of his reading, Black Tide played for about thirty seconds, bringing the whole thing to close in a cascade of sound. Frey stood on the stage and took questions, some of which were about the book, some not. "This was my favorite book to write." "My favorite band is Black Tide." "My wife is a New Yorker. She wanted to live there. If it were up to me, we'd live here." Someone asked why California is so f*cked up? "Because dumb motherf***ers like you live here." After reassuring the crowd that Black Tide would play again, Frey made his way to a booth to do his signing. Immediately, he was mobbed by folks who wanted to meet him, to shake his hand, to get their book signed. Despite what seemed like a mob of people, Frey took time to meet everyone, sign their books, take pictures, shake hands.

Frey mobbed by autograph-seekers.

After the Whisky moved the tables and warned the crowd against moshing, Black Tide began their second set. Within minutes, two security guys from the Whisky dragged someone out of the club for crashing into a table. A brawl erupted outside the club, not twenty feet from where Frey was still signing. That was a first for me, a brawl at a book signing. But it was that kind of event.

Katie and I selling books. Somebody had to.


James Frey with the folks from Vroman's and Book Soup. This photo might've been taken by Frey's terrifying bodyguard. I'm not totally sure. The rest of the photos were taken by Charles, from Book Soup. Charles rocks.

Thanks to everybody who showed up to what was the most interesting book event I've been to in a while.

Labels: , ,

Friday, May 16, 2008

More Rave Reviews for Vroman's Authors


A full account of the James Frey event at the Whisky is forthcoming, but I wanted to point out, for all who may have missed it, that Joseph O'Neill's novel Netherland got a rave review by Michiko Kakutani in today's New York Times:
If some of these passages reverberate with echoes of “The Great Gatsby” and its vision of New York — “the old island here that flowered once for Dutch sailors’ eyes,” the “fresh, green breast of the New World,” which nourished its hero’s belief “in the green light, the orgiastic future that year by year recedes before us” — the reader can only surmise that they are entirely deliberate, for, like Fitzgerald’s masterpiece, Joseph O’Neill’s stunning new novel, “Netherland,” provides a resonant meditation on the American Dream.
Joseph O'Neill will be discussing and signing Netherland at Vroman's on June 25.

Labels: ,

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Thursday List of Links

As I'm lilting along in the calm between two enormous, high-energy events (Barbara Walters last night, James Frey tonight), I think I'll keep today's post short and pointless:
  • Critic Wyatt Mason has started a blog called Sentences at the Harper's site. The posts are smart and very literary. I doubt he'll be able to keep up this kind of word count on a daily basis, but so far, it's one of the most intellectually stimulating blogs on the net (after just two days). Does that sound like a backhanded complement? It isn't.
  • Don't look now, but Nam Le is getting the full-on Charles Bock treatment with a rave review from Michiko Kakutani followed by a profile in the Times. "Like most of the other details in “The Boat” (Alfred A. Knopf), his collection that came out Tuesday, they were pulled from assiduous research he did from a fungus-plagued farmhouse in Iowa City, his home for two years while at the Iowa Writers’ Workshop." Hey, I've been to that fungus-plagued farmhouse! Cool. Hopefully, we'll all be spared the Gawker backlash that Bock was subjected to.
  • Books that will make you a man. I really dig the images they found for each of the books, although, judging by this list, I'm not terribly manly (haven't gotten around to the Plutarch's Lives yet...go ahead, mock my ignorance), and any manliness I currently possess, I acquired in the 8th grade (A Separate Peace? Please.).
  • Robert Rauschenberg passed away this week. I'm not going to say much about the man or his work (What it does it matter what some jackass with a bookstore blog thinks?), but I will say that seeing a retrospective of his at the Centre Georges Pompidou was one of the highlights of my honeymoon in Paris. I was ignorant of all the work he'd done in dance, and to see even film and video of his work with the Merce Cunningham company was revelatory. I'll also say this -- I'd like to bring back this look:







It's smart, youthful, spare, neat without seeming overly fastidious. I wish I looked like this. Of course I also go through periods where I'd kill to look like Sam Shepard in Days of Heaven, so go figure.


  • Willy Vlautin will be at Vroman's tomorrow night to read from his new book Northline. He'll also be playing some songs on his guitar. To get you in the mood, I located this rare You Tube footage of Willy in action:
If he's this good while playing in the "work center" of a Sheraton hotel room, imagine how ass-kicking he'll be in the Vroman's event space. A reading and a concert. How can you miss it?

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, May 12, 2008

Ghostly Inspirations: A Guest Post by Kate Mosse

Kate Mosse is the author of Labyrinth and, most recently, Sepulchre. She visited Vroman's in April to present her new book. Now back in her native London, she agreed to write a little bit about the inspirations behind Sepulchre, in particular the British writer Algernon Henry Blackwood. Here are her thoughts on this writer and his influence on her work:

One of the ways many novelists research and prepare for writing is, obviously, to read works in a similar vein. Non-fiction, poetry, short stories, novels, everything and anything. My latest novel Sepulchre - set in fin-de-siècle Paris and the Languedoc (southwest France) and the same locations a century later – is part occult tale of revenge, part ghost story. The heroines are a young Parisian girl, Léonie Vernier, in the 19th century and an American academic and biographer, Meredith Martin, in the 21st, in France working on a biography of the composer, Claude Debussy.

Sepulchre was in part inspired by my own (rather gloomy!) teenage reading - the doomed French genius Guy de Maupassant, the chilling poetry of Baudelaire, the disquieting, mercurial Edgar Allan Poe and the brilliant, sometimes under celebrated, ghost stories of Henry James. They are all familiar names to most devotees of 19th century literature and writers whom I cite when asked to nominate my favourite novels (although no list would be complete without Wuthering Heights, not only for the tragic love story or the historical verisimilitude, but for the genius loci, the spirit of place that animates the tale - the lonely house, the window seat, the vast kitchen, above all the wind-scorched moors.

But, missing from this list – and certainly an important literary inspiration for - is someone less familiar to contemporary American readers, the British writer, Algernon Henry Blackwood.

Algernon Blackwood was born in 1869, the eve of the Paris Commune, in Shooter’s Hill, now a part of southeast London, then in the Kent countryside. ‘A strong emotion,’ Blackwood said later, ‘especially if experienced for the first time, leaves a vivid memory of the scene where it occurred.’ It is mere chance that Shooter’s Hill runs alongside Blackheath, where the victims of the Great Plague were interred in mass graves.

Blackwood and his four siblings were brought up with a ‘unique ignorance of life’ in a family of unyielding Christian beliefs. As a teenager he was sent away to school – an austere establishment run by the Moravian Brotherhood in the Black Forest. He described the spirit of that place in his autobiographical Episodes before Thirty, published in 1923: ‘Those leagues of Black Forest rolling over distant mountains, velvet-coloured, leaping to the sky in grey cliffs, or passing quietly like the sea in immense waves, always singing in the winds, haunted by elves and dwarves and peopled by charming legends – those forest glades, deep in moss and covered in springtime with wild lily-of-the-valley.’

Perhaps it was here that Blackwood first felt the stirring of a set of beliefs that he would later call ‘animist’, ascribing a spiritual life to all of creation, including inanimate things. Perhaps it was Christianity, as practised by the Moravian Brothers, that drove him from God and into the arms of the Deity of Nature – always, for Blackwood, with a capital N.

I suppose Algernon Blackwood might have become a botanist or a naturalist or one of the many self-deluding spiritists and other visionaries who exploited a gullible public with a promise of transcendence. But he didn’t. He became an Edwardian English gent with a twist, a spinner of weird tales, both a product of his theosophical times and free to look objectively down upon them. His pose was like that of M R James, another bachelor story teller, his arms behind his back before the fire, weaving occult and spine chilling tales for the amusement of friends and younger relatives. Unlike M R James, the acknowledged father of the modern ghost story, Blackwood is less read and less available.

For me, as a writer, even more than his weird tales of psychic detectives and retributive ghosts and ancient demons being summoned by old words and spells, is the idea that Nature is sentient. It was not a sentimental affectation. He felt that to be unbound within Nature was the only way in which to be free and alive.

Blackwood seems to have been suggestible and yet determined, tolerant but unshakably focused on finding his own path. He was teetotal and wore a strip of blue ribbon signifying membership of Band of Hope. One of five children, he appreciated his father’s depth of faith – ‘genuine, unfaltering, consistent and sincere’ – and rejected it. On the other hand, he developed a lifelong interest in and commitment to Buddhism when he read the work of a Hindu sage, left by accident at his parents’ house. He understood time as a sequence – ‘the present was the result of the past’.

At the age of 20, Blackwood already called himself a Buddhist and had grown to an impressive 6ft 3 in height. ‘My unworldliness, even at 21, was abnormal. Not only had I never smoked tobacco nor touched alcohol of any description, but I had never yet set foot inside a theatre, race course I had never seen, nor held a billiard cue, nor touched a card.’ He took his inexperience and a generous allowance of £100 per annum to Canada. He farmed and hunted moose in the wilderness.

But he saw life. From Canada he moved on to New York. At Mrs Bernstein’s boarding house on East 19th St, he dodged the cockroaches to forge important friendships, roughing it, sharing rooms and beds and finding it quite natural for those in straightened circumstances. He consumed a cheap and cheerful diet of salted chip potatoes and glasses of beer at 5 cents each, strips of spiced liver sausage on small squares of bread. He visited Ikey’s pawn shop on 3rd Avenue. He must have seen sorrow, too: ‘It is the little things that pierce and burn and prick for years to come.’

He earnt $3 a week as a reporter on the New York Evening Sun. The echo of the anti-hero of Maupassant’s Bel Ami was not lost on him. He read Shelley’s Prometheus Unbound at the free library, attended meetings of the Theosophical Society. Then he fell ill and, in his fever, ‘I saw the winds, changing colours as they rose and fell, attached to the trees in tenuous ribands of gold and blue and scarlet.'

The story telling began, not in comfortable Cambridge rooms like M R James, but in the boarding house on East 19th when the absinthe was uninspiring or he and his friends had no dress suits to go out in. ‘I used to tell, strange, wild improbable tales akin to ghost stories, discovered a taste for spinning yarns.’ His friend Angus Hamilton would write them down. ‘Many a story I published fifteen years later had its germ in the apparently dead moments of those wearisome hours, although at the time it never once occurred to me to try and write, not even the desire being in me.’

Back in Europe he explored – hiking, paddling and climbing – in Italy, France, Spain, Austria, the Balkans and Sweden. He visited Egypt. Finally – and I see him as rather like the wind-swept gent in an Edwardian tail coat on a mountaintop on the cover of the classic edition of Thus Spoke Zarathustra – he made a home in Switzerland.

He was not yet a writer: ‘It never occurred to me to write even a description of our picturesque way of living, much less to attempt an essay or a story.’ Nevertheless, much later, the commentator and editor of his work S T Joshi would underline the many biographical elements in his stories – settings, experiences, people he met – how his protagonists are scarcely veiled self portraits. The bizarre and threatening situations he invented for his imaginary world form, in part, a sequence of questions addressed to himself, to his own understanding and experience. ‘I have slept in strange places since – high in the Caucasus, on the shores of the Black Sea, on the Egyptian desert, on the banks of the Danube, in the Black Forest and Hungary.’

But write he did – in all over 200 short stories, 12 novels, plays, poetry, some children’s writing, plus at 54, his early years autobiography Episodes before Thirty. In his fiction he invented herds of magical creatures, reincarnated bloodlines and explored the potential for humans to evolve beyond their current mundane consciousness. He developed a style of writing that relied on suggestion and atmosphere. He understood the power of the intangible. He knew, like Kipling, that ‘it’s smells, more than sights or sounds, that make the heart strings crack.’ His tone if often determined by the cool but sympathetic eye cast on the most outlandish circumstances by his hero, John Silence.

Much of his work is out of print. Tales of innocent campers who pitch their tent in a place where another dimension intersects with our own; the psychological transformation of a diffident aristocrat; a house haunted by the echo of religious intolerance; reincarnation as a path to revenge; the ghastly truth of humanity’s true purpose revealed by a quest inspired by a dream; a beguiling dangerous stranger met by moonlight on a snowy mountainside; a man loved – to his downfall – by trees.

In any life there are areas of shadow and I have never forced myself to research Blackwood as I have the heretic Cathars – whose story is at the heart of my previous novel, Labyrinth - or the development of the Tarot, which plays a significant, albeit secondary, role in Sepulchre. Is it true Blackwood served as an English spy in World War I? It wouldn’t surprise me if he tested his understanding and nerve by visiting haunted houses with charlatans and the honestly credulous. What did he make of the ‘teacher of sacred dances’ Gurdjieff and the guru of the ‘Fourth Way’ Ouspensky? I hope he smiled wryly and moved on.

Blackwood saw all experience as – potentially – spiritual. An understanding of Nature would lead to faith and knowledge of how to live. His vivid engagement with life is reminiscent of Conan Doyle’s Holmes, with whom Blackwood shared the ability to play the violin and a use of morphine. Unlike Holmes, he was not an astute judge of character. He is perhaps well portrayed in The Centaur under the disguise of the protagonist Terence O’Malley, a man bemused at the spite and narrowness of the people who surround him. He is careless of his own property and mortified to taken advantage of but also at committing social gaffes. It is a picture of a ‘too-sensitive’ man. O’Malley allows his friend, a German doctor in New York, to inject him with morphine …

The best of Blackwood’s writing is beautiful – passionate, curiously intense, an interplay of colour and cadence of sentence structure. The worst of it is when, like many of us, the emotion overwhelms the sense. The getting lulled into the lullaby of the words without giving thought to the meaning. As Daudet said, to write about pain convincingly is ‘all but impossible’.
Late in his life, there was a Blackwood revival – or perhaps an intensification and extension of the cult of his admirers. He made his first radio broadcast in the mid-1930s and continued this strand after end of World War II. He was a television pioneer, appearing on the BBC as a storyteller. In 1949 he was awarded the CBE.

Returning to the works of Blackwood in the past few years, while writing Sepulchre, I can see how some of his writings might be considered a little ‘purple’ for modern tastes. Elaborate, occasionally an unhappy union between emotion and intention, brimming with ideas that were current in the early part of the twentieth century but which, now, seem a little idealistic, a little naïve, even, to our modern eyes and ears. But, at his best, Blackwood’s descriptions of the landscapes of Canada and North America equal those of Willa Cather, Jack London and Flannery O’Connor.

In Episodes before Thirty, Blackwood gave this simple explanation as to the inspirations for his writing: ‘I loved the night, the shadows, empty rooms and haunted woods.’

The words serve not only as a wonderful epitaph to Blackwood’s own body of work, but to all of us attempting to follow in his ghostly footsteps.

Kate Mosse’s novel Sepulchre is published by G P Putnam’s Sons @ $25.95
www.KateMosse.com

Labels: , , ,

"I make the rules...": James Frey, Interviewed

James Frey's new novel Bright Shiny Morning goes on sale today. This Thursday, May 15 at 7:30 pm, Vroman's and Book Soup present James Frey at the Whisky A Go-Go, with special guests Josh Kilmer-Purcell and Black Tide and pictures by Terry Richardson. It is free and open to the public. In anticipation of this event, Mr. Frey was good enough to sit down and answer a few questions.

How long did it take you to write Bright Shiny Morning?

It took about ten months. From October of 2006 until August of 2007.

Were you living in LA during that time?

No. I was living in New York City, and Amagansett, New York. I was in LA twice for about two weeks during the writing process.

The novel follows four intertwining stories (as well as numerous other smaller stories). Which of the four main story lines came to you first? Was there ever a time when you thought you might follow only one story for the novel or did you always have an idea that there were multiple story lines throughout?

I originally had six or seven narratives that I was thinking about, but decided that anything more than four would be too much, and would be too diluted. I chose the four that I did because I thought they were all different from each other, but were also very representative of Los Angeles as a city. Some of the others got folded into smaller pieces, or smaller stories, and some of them were discarded. I always envisioned the book as having multiple protagonists, as using multiple narratives.

I don’t know if you’ve read it or not, but Bright Shiny Morning reminded me of John Dos Passos’ The 42nd Parallel in the way that it shifts between different narratives and includes sections meant to show a snapshot of life in the city. What books, if any, influenced this one? What were you reading when you wrote it?

I know Dos Passos’ work. The influence from it, if there is any, was to try and break rules in how I structured the book, as he did, and to try to tell a vast story in an unconventional, but highly accessible way, which he also did. Ultimately, though, I tried to write a book that was unlike anything that has preceded it, that is devoid of any real influence, and that’s singular in its composition and voice, but also immediately recognizable as my work. I have tried to do this with each of my books. I want to tell stories in new, fresh ways. I want my writing to reflect the age in which we live, which is fast, contains vast amounts of information, and uses new ways to present the information. I always read while I write, but for pleasure, not inspiration or influence.

At what point did those historical facts start coming into the narrative? How did the decision to include some “fake facts” come about? It reminded me a little bit of the Museum of Jurassic Technology (which is, of course, in Los Angeles), which plays with conventional notions of the museum. Is this playing with fact and fiction the result of what happened with A Million Little Pieces?

In certain ways, the main character of the book is the city of LA itself, and in order to give a thorough treatment of it, I had always planned to include a history of the city in the book, and incorporate as much statistical and demographic information as I could without bogging down the narratives. Because the book is fiction, I felt like I had the liberty to present the history, and the statistics and demographics, in any way I saw fit. The decision was made during the writing process. I don’t remember with which fact, or supposed fact, but there came a point where I couldn’t find what I wanted, or needed, so I just created it. It is definitely a reaction to what happened with my other books. I feel liked doing it is a statement which I want to make it, which is that I make the rules about what is or is not appropriate in my work, and whatever rules people expect me to follow mean nothing to me.

This is a popular narrative form for stories about Los Angeles. I’m thinking of movies like Crash, Magnolia, and even the film version of Short Cuts. What is it about Los Angeles (as opposed to New York or Chicago) that seems to inspire this multi-narrative form?
I think it has something to do with the vast spread of LA. It’s a not a centralized city, and centralized, or single narrative stories, aren’t always appropriate for it. There is, however, one significant, important, and very deliberate difference between the narratives you listed, and the ones in my book. I’m not going into it, though. Would rather let people figure it out.

I know you’re not big on revising, but I’m wondering how much of this was laid out in your head and how much was spontaneous? How much outlining did you do and how much did you just charge ahead?

There was no outline. I had a list of things I wanted to write about, and when I got stuck somewhere, I’d look at the list and figure out what to use. Beyond that list, everything was in my head, written by instinct, by feel. I want the book to be unexpected, to feel unexpected. I never want the reader to know what’s coming next, which narrative, or whether it will be a narrative or something else. I never knew while I was writing what was going to come next.

You live in New York now, and from this book, I would guess that you don’t like Los Angeles. Much of the book focuses on how so many people come here chasing their dreams, and most of them end up as waiters, gardeners, sex workers, or corpses. Yet I see in various interviews that you “love Los Angeles.” If that’s so, why focus on these specific stories? I’m not trying to deny the ugly or painful aspects of LA, but I am curious why these stories.

I absolutely love LA. I think it’s a great great place, absolutely singular and unique. I think of this book as love letter to the city. Maybe not a fawning love letter, or one that’s been sprayed with perfume, but definitely a love letter. It’s the type you write to someone you love, but who’s faults you recognize, and whose faults you cherish. LA is a beautiful place and ugly place, an exciting place and a place filled with despair. There is no city on earth where more people comes to chase and realize their dreams, whether that dream is fame and fortune, or a green card and a job. The reality is that most of those dreams never come true.

You once wrote “all writing is a form of autobiography.” Do you still believe that’s true and if so, how does the autobiographical aspect come out in this novel?

I lived in LA for eight years. I would have never written the book, or conceived of it, without having had the experiences I had while I was there. I also tended to write about what I knew in LA: the places, neighborhoods, the types of people. The Venice narrative, in particular, is set in my old neighborhood. Like I said above, I love Los Angeles. This is my tribute to it, in all of its glory and all of its ugliness.

What do you miss about living in LA? What don’t you miss?

I miss the sun, the beach, the ocean. I miss the pace of life, which is slower and mellower. I miss hamburger joints on every corner, humongous grocery stores, the dread of the 405. I miss seeing the mountains in the distance. I miss my friends.

It’s a complete cliché, but I don’t miss the traffic.

Describe your ideal day in Los Angeles. What would you do? Where would you go?

Wake up put on shorts walk down to the beach have coffee. Maybe go for a swim, maybe just sit and watch the waves. In-and-Out burger for lunch, go to a bookstore get a good book, sit on the porch of my old house and read for a couple. Either sushi or Mexican for dinner, definitely eat outside. Go to sleep with the sound of crashing waves.

Have you considered writing a memoir about the aftermath of A Million Little Pieces?

I’ll never publish anything classified as a memoir again. If I do it, I’ll call it Memoir, make sure it’s factually and sourcebly accurate, and publish it as fiction.

What should we expect from the event on the 15th at the Whisky?

Some good words, some cool pictures, and some heavy metal music that absolutely fucking rocks.

James Frey's new book, Bright Shiny Morning is on sale now. If you can't make it to the event and would like a signed copy, you can get one at Vroman's website.

Labels: , , ,

Vroman's Authors in the Press

Several authors for whom we'll be hosting events have popped up in the press these past few days.
  • The new episode of Titlepage is up. It doesn't feature any authors with upcoming events at Vroman's, but one of the panelists is Nam Le, who I had the pleasure of knowing when I lived in Iowa City (and who is one hell of a card player). While checking out the episode, I was psyched to see that Daniel Menaker, host of Titlepage, recommends The Drunkard's Walk, by Leonard Mlodinow, who will be at Vroman's on Wednesday, June 11 at 7 pm. This book looks fascinating, as it examines chance, probability, and the role of luck in life. Check it out.

Labels: , ,

Friday, May 09, 2008

Felicia Sullivan Interview

Callie Miller from Counterbalance has an interview with Felicia Sullivan, author of The Sky Isn't Visible from Here up at LAist:

On odd Q&A that results from writing a memoir:
"One gentleman asked if my mother had “jungle fever” and whether I’d be angry if my biological father (whom I know nothing about) were black."

She goes on to recommend a few memoirs that I've enjoyed, including Nick Flynn's Another Bullshit Night in Suck City and Joan Didion's The Year of Magical Thinking.

Felicia Sullivan will be at Vroman's this Saturday, May 10 at 4pm.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, May 08, 2008

President Jimmy Carter at Vroman's


He's the one in the middle. (And, man, does he sign fast!)

Labels: , ,

Another Good Book Trailer

Doing a little research for some upcoming events, I came across a trailer for Willy Vlautin's new book Northline. It's another good one:



It's simple, really well photographed, and it gives you a perfect impression of the book's mood and atmosphere. To be fair, Vlautin has an advantage, since that's his music in the background (He's in the band Richmond Fontaine). Still, it's another example of a simple, cheap (I'm guessing) and effective trailer.

Willy Vlautin will be reading and signing his new book Northline at Vroman's on Friday, May 16 at 7 pm. Stop by and you just might hear some music, too.

Labels: , ,

Book Trailers Examined

Book trailers are a source of fascination right now in both the publishing industry and the blogging world. Publishers like them because they're internet-friendly marketing devices for books, which were previously pretty tough to represent online. Bloggers like trailers, I think, because they give them some moving pictures and sound to jazz up their otherwise fairly static, text-heavy sites. And, occasionally, something to mock.

Most often, the book trailer acts as a platform for the author to talk about the book in a straightforward, interview style. This is by far the most common type of book trailer, and, I think, the least effective. Trailers of this style fail for a number of reason, not the least of which are unintentionally humorous background scores or unwanted secondary "messages." Take this trailer for Tom Rob Smith's new thriller Child 44, which is a favorite new book of many here at Vroman's, but which got a merely okay review from Janet Maslin in the New York Times today (I'm having some trouble embedding this video, so if it doesn't appear follow this link to watch it):








The author sits in his apartment with a drab yet beautiful view of some European city and more or less tells you what the book is about. Okay, except that what he's saying isn't as interesting to me as his apartment (which probably says something about me?). Sweet digs! This video plays like porn for aspiring authors: Work hard on your novel, and someday people will watch a video of you as you sit in your shabby-chic leather chair in your minimalist apartment and intone meaningfully about your atmospheric thriller. Since I imagine all novelists spend two hours each day writing and four hours imagining themselves on Charlie Rose, I suspect that authors secretly like this kind of book trailer quite a bit (although, when asked on Charlie Rose, they'll say it's just part of the business, and that they're not really into the whole "branding thing").

A more successful strategy is to make a sort of clever short film out the trailer. The gold standard for this sort of trailer is the fingers-as-legs short film promoting Sloane Crosley's I Was Told There'd Be Cake:




Clever, right? It says something about the book in a memorable way, and yet doesn't have a single talking head. Talking heads are boring, no matter how interesting or attractive they are. [I have to stop here for a second and go on my Sloane Crosley rant. About two weeks ago, every single publishing industry-centric blog ran like twenty stories about Sloane Crosley, talking about how she was everywhere and wasn't it amazing and how would she deal with the backlash...What I gathered from these posts, whether it was intended or not, is that a lot of bloggers think Sloane Crosley is really cute. Was that the primary message of those posts? No, but it was definitely there. I'm not saying any of this to be critical of Sloane Crosley, who is, let's face it, cute, and whose book seems funny, and who is obviously, judging from her book trailer and her dioramas, way more creative than the average bear. But enough already, bloggers! Show a little dignity. I mean Tom Rob Smith is kind of dreamy in a Hugh Laurie-meets-Chris Martin kind of way, but you don't see people sending him virtual teddy bears on Facebook now, do you? And if I see one more post that starts with "I Was Told There'd Be [A Launch Party, A Blog Post, An Interview]," I will go on a three state killing spree (or curse silently at my desk, whichever is more convenient at the time). Okay, that felt good. Back to the post.] Is it a coincidence that Sloane Crosley is a publicist and that her book trailer is a little more savvy than the others? I think not.

So when your publicist wants you to sit down for an interview for the book trailer, and you're in a conference room at Simon and Schuster with a bottle of Volvic water and there's a big poster of your book behind you, rather than thank god you wore your tweed jacket, think of the fingers. If your people insist on the talking head format, maybe you can demand that you appear shrouded in shadow, like a corporate whistle-blower, or that you be animated, Waking Life style. That might be fun. Anyway, I'm curious to hear from others what book trailers they like and why?

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Three Intriguing Food Stories

Who else read Eric Schlosser's Op-Ed piece about corporate spying in the NY Times today and felt like, I don't know, never eating at Burger King again? As if anyone needed further incentive to avoid the King's "food," he apparently sent his minions to infiltrate non-profit groups who were trying to improve labor conditions for migrant farm workers in Florida. Well, not the King himself. I'm sure that dude with the big head in those creepy commercials is totally cool, but the guy who signs his checks? Not so much.

Of course, you could buy your food from a local farmer's market, where some of that food might come from a formerly vacant lot.

And while you're at that farmer's market, if you choose to buy only veggies, that doesn't make you weird or some kind of insufferable food elitist, it just means you don't eat meat.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

What Do You Read? And Why?

There's a really fascinating back and forth happening at the Millions these past few days. It started when someone asked for some book recommendations, and it's morphed into a discussion of taste as it relates to reading lists. People take a long time deciding what to read, much longer than they typically take deciding which movie to see, where to eat dinner, or whether or not to watch The Hills (to watch, definitely). Some of this is natural, since it takes a good deal longer to read a book than watch a movie, eat a meal, or to watch a TV show. But that's not the only reason. Books are a signifier for being smart, and certain books are a flag, a symbol that the reader is of a certain sect. Toting around Infinite Jest, as I saw one young woman doing during the blast furnace heat of the LA Times Festival of Books, says something very clear about what that person hopes to accomplish. It says that reading isn't mere leisure. I think this becomes ingrained in us very early on, when we are made to read certain books for school. Reading at all becomes associated with knowledge, and certain books get a stamp of approval while others don't.

But how many of us construct our reading lists solely along high-brow or low-brow divides? I don't think I do. I've read Gravity's Rainbow and Europe Central (I even liked Europe Central), and I'm a regular watcher of The Hills (Do not get me started on Justin Bobby's new look!). I would rehash my entire reading list since the new year, but as I moonlight as a book critic and often read books I wouldn't choose, I don't think that'd be very enlightening. Rather, I'll ask the question of you: when reading, do you tend to choose books you know will challenge you or do you look for a great story? Are you reading with a knowledge of literary theory or is it a more passive act? Do you read Michael Connelly and also Junot Diaz? Let me know. I'm the curious type.

Labels: , ,

Monday, May 05, 2008

The NBCC's "Good Reads" List for Spring

The NBCC "Good Reads" list for spring is out, and, not surprisingly, people are up in arms. The comments on the NBCC's Critical Mass blog run the gamut from supportive to vitriolic (and really self-righteous). We all know I've been critical of these lists in the past, so I'm sure you're all waiting to hear what I think of the lists (I imagine everyone in the NBCC offices huddled around their computer waiting for the Google Alert to come up), so let's get to it.

The Fiction List features a few "usual suspects," such as Lush Life by Richard Price and Unaccustomed Earth by Jhumpa Lahiri, but I was pleased to see the list branching out a little bit. It sent me off in search of a few books I hadn't heard of (including Brian Hall's Fall of Frost and Roxanna Robinson's Cost), and considering I work in an independent bookstore, that's got to be a good sign.

The Non-Fiction List offers fewer surprises, but I think still represents a great selection of books on a variety of topics. There's a memoir, a work of criticism, and a few histories thrown in, as well.

Are these lists perfect? No, of course not, but I would say they show an improvement from the previous efforts, which championed the same three books at the top of consecutive lists. I suppose we'll have to see if the summer list is the same as this one before pronouncing the process fixed, but this is definitely a step forward, regardless of what a few of the commentators think.

Thursday, May 01, 2008

Mamma Mia! Ticket Giveaway!

Okay, folks. Have at it! If you want two free tickets to Mamma Mia! at the Pasadena Civic on May 7 (that's this coming Wednesday), please post your email in the comments area. Drawing will be open all weekend. We'll choose a winner Monday morning. Good luck!

I'm Taking a Red Eye Flight Tonight

Should I bring anything to read or should I just sleep? Tough call. Recommendations would be welcome.